Sex toy companies are a kind of girl in use?

When I was surfing the Internet yesterday, best phone controlled vibratorI brushed such a comment: girls who use beauty products are good girls.

The comments were divided into two groups. best phone controlled vibratorOne side has many supporters and many opinions: girls also have the right to use toys. Another school said: "This girl must be very playful to use this toy."

Watching them argue, best phone controlled vibratorthe director couldn't help himself! So the debate today is: "Is girls' entertainment their commodity?"

The girl who has a partner, best phone controlled vibratorwould rather not play with toys and partners, who should reflect on it?

As for the partner who is invited to play with the students, you should be happy to know how hard she has worked to improve our apricot happiness index? After all, Chinese toys are good, best phone controlled vibratorand the happiness is that you can be two people.

What can a single woman with normal needs do without toys?

Either agreement

Either hold back

The former is unsafe and prone to problems. best phone controlled vibratorThe latter is unhealthy and prone to problems.

What does it say about them when they choose to use toys? That means they know a lot!

Know how to face up to your desires and release them in a safer and healthier way. Instead of choosing other ways of carrying firewood to put out the fire, this is simply self-sufficient, self-reliant and self-interested? !

If companies label S-goods because of us, why don't boys who use a toy get "equal treatment"?

From the human structure, their physiological response is simple and rough, walking on the street, with a little attention can string out "Optimus Prime". From the perspective of daily life, there are more male xx harassing female xx news.

This has formed an illusion that "boys are always hungry for sex, while girls only pursue sincere love." I even think X-addiction is a boys' problem.

All these "prejudices", in exchange for the society's "tolerance" of boys, their difficulties in the X side is uncontrollable. It's in their nature, and it's okay to let it out with toys.

If it's harmless for boys to use toys, why do girls have to take the blame?

In traditional cultural concepts, men dominate the social position: "Men who talk about sex are normal, and women who talk about sex are lustful"

So when boys get "stallions," the same sex is secretly jealous, and women with multiple sexual partners are often called sluts. The director couldn't help but ask:

What is sex, anyway?

As normal as eating and sleeping, apparently, as normal as a boy's sperm. Girls don't panic when they get their period.

Why should men and women be treated differently? After years of literacy campaigns, it is time to break the ideological chastity lock.

To sum up, the conclusion of today's debate is that small toys for girls do not equal goods.

In fact, whether we are for men and women, toy companies can be normal physiological development needs. This act of breaking free from the shackles of old ideas needs no explanation to anyone, nor should they be ashamed of it.

Because it's only when we confront our sexual desires and rights that our sex education really begins.

Although we this little thing, let us ourselves know that their life is the original business can pass without being so pale. But everything must have a degree, after all, every day to see the object will also look tired of it.

The next time someone points a little toy at you, don't worry about them, just do it

"What you think is your business, and I'll be happy. "